<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Ways to Install .. Here&#039;s Why Aptitude Is Best?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guvnr.com/pc/ubuntu-package-installer-methods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guvnr.com/pc/ubuntu-package-installer-methods/</link>
	<description>Make the web, make more of it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:52:55 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: the_guv</title>
		<link>http://guvnr.com/pc/ubuntu-package-installer-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-6610</link>
		<dc:creator>the_guv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guvnr.com/?p=2750#comment-6610</guid>
		<description>@village .. tx for this .. have been searching for a definitive answer for a long time with no luck .. there are various threads on ubuntuforums about this, with none that I have seen clarifying the position.  therefore I personally continue to use aptitude, to be safe .. but tell me, if they are the same now (I realise you are not quite saying this, but are they?) then why have both?

appreciate your feedback.  any official link about this would be most appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@village .. tx for this .. have been searching for a definitive answer for a long time with no luck .. there are various threads on ubuntuforums about this, with none that I have seen clarifying the position.  therefore I personally continue to use aptitude, to be safe .. but tell me, if they are the same now (I realise you are not quite saying this, but are they?) then why have both?</p>
<p>appreciate your feedback.  any official link about this would be most appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: village</title>
		<link>http://guvnr.com/pc/ubuntu-package-installer-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-6579</link>
		<dc:creator>village</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guvnr.com/?p=2750#comment-6579</guid>
		<description>since version 0.6.44.2ubuntu1 (3 Jul 2006) apt-get records which packages it installed automatically (by dependencies) and which ones it installed &quot;by command&quot;.
So you don&#039;t have the aptitude/apt &quot;problems&quot; any longer.

Source: /usr/share/doc/apt/changelog.gz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since version 0.6.44.2ubuntu1 (3 Jul 2006) apt-get records which packages it installed automatically (by dependencies) and which ones it installed "by command".<br />
So you don't have the aptitude/apt "problems" any longer.</p>
<p>Source: /usr/share/doc/apt/changelog.gz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the_guv</title>
		<link>http://guvnr.com/pc/ubuntu-package-installer-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-4714</link>
		<dc:creator>the_guv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guvnr.com/?p=2750#comment-4714</guid>
		<description>@Ben .. tx for tips</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ben .. tx for tips</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://guvnr.com/pc/ubuntu-package-installer-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-4546</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guvnr.com/?p=2750#comment-4546</guid>
		<description>Double posting now - just some edits for your .bashrc
alias install=&#039;sudo aptitude install&#039;
alias remove=&#039;sudo aptitude remove&#039;
alias autoremove=&#039;sudo apt-get autoclean &amp;&amp; sudo apt-get autoremove &amp;&amp; sudo apt-get clean &amp;&amp; sudo apt-get remove &amp;&amp; orphand&#039;
alias repo=&#039;sudo add-apt-repository&#039;
alias update=&#039;sudo aptitude update &amp;&amp; sudo aptitude safe-upgrade&#039;

I guess you could say I prefer aptitude also ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Double posting now - just some edits for your .bashrc<br />
alias install='sudo aptitude install'<br />
alias remove='sudo aptitude remove'<br />
alias autoremove='sudo apt-get autoclean &amp;&amp; sudo apt-get autoremove &amp;&amp; sudo apt-get clean &amp;&amp; sudo apt-get remove &amp;&amp; orphand'<br />
alias repo='sudo add-apt-repository'<br />
alias update='sudo aptitude update &amp;&amp; sudo aptitude safe-upgrade'</p>
<p>I guess you could say I prefer aptitude also <img src='http://guvnr.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://guvnr.com/pc/ubuntu-package-installer-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-4545</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guvnr.com/?p=2750#comment-4545</guid>
		<description>No sign of Jig here? I&#039;m getting into using both Jig, and sometimes I use apt-fast which is also very cool. Give them a whirl ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No sign of Jig here? I'm getting into using both Jig, and sometimes I use apt-fast which is also very cool. Give them a whirl <img src='http://guvnr.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
